When I started in IT leadership two decades ago, I obsessed over finding the "perfect" team size. I'd read all the research about how 5-8 people was the sweet spot. I stressed when my teams grew beyond those numbers, convinced our effectiveness would plummet.
Then I watched Bill Belichick win championships with an organizational chart that defied every conventional management theory.
If we're honest, most management advice about "ideal team size" misses the point entirely. Having looked under the hood of Belichick's Patriots organization, I've reached a conclusion that has transformed how I build teams: the size of your team doesn't matter nearly as much as the clarity of your expectations.
The Belichick Blueprint: Size Is Secondary to Structure
Looking at Belichick's full football operations structure from 2018 reveals something fascinating. The man was directly responsible for an organization with over 30 coaches and staff members across multiple departments. On paper, this should have been unwieldy and inefficient according to most management theories.
Yet, the Patriots were the most disciplined and consistent organization in sports.
Why? Because Belichick understood that organizational effectiveness isn't about headcount—it's about clarity.
His "Do Your Job" philosophy wasn't just a catchy slogan; it was the operating system for the entire organization. Every person—whether they were Josh McDaniels coordinating the offense or Nancy Meier handling scouting administration—knew exactly what was expected of them.
This clarity of purpose eliminated the coordination costs that typically plague large teams.
The Real Problem Isn't Team Size—It's Ambiguity
In my experience transforming IT departments from cost centers to strategic assets, I've found that teams don't struggle because they're too big or too small. They struggle because people don't know exactly what they're responsible for or how success is measured.
When I work with leadership teams now, I don't start by asking how many direct reports they have. I ask:
- Does every person on your team know exactly what they're accountable for?
- Can everyone recite the top three priorities without hesitation?
- Is there a clear decision-making framework that everyone follows?
If you can answer "yes" to these questions, I've seen teams of 30 outperform teams of 7. I've watched "oversized" departments move with the agility of startups because everyone understands the game plan.
Creating Clarity at Scale: My Playbook
So how do you create this level of clarity regardless of team size? Here's what I've learned works:
1. Define the non-negotiables.
Like Belichick's "Do Your Job" mantra, establish 3-5 principles that guide all behavior. At Visual Edge IT, our core values create guardrails that allow for autonomy within boundaries. When everyone knows these principles, you don't need to micromanage.
2. Establish clear ownership areas.
One of the Patriots' strengths was that every coach knew exactly which position group they owned. There was no ambiguity about who was responsible for developing cornerbacks or offensive linemen. In your organization, can everyone name what they definitively own?
3. Create a common language.
Belichick's organization spoke the same football language. There was no confusion about terminology or objectives. When I've led large IT transformations, establishing a shared vocabulary has been just as important as any process change.
4. Master the feedback loop.
The Patriots famously reviewed game film with ruthless honesty. Whether your team is 5 or 50 people, regular, direct feedback closes gaps before they become chasms.
Breaking Free From Management Mythology
The most liberating moment in my leadership journey came when I stopped worrying about org chart aesthetics and focused instead on organizational clarity.
I've seen CIOs with five direct reports struggling with teams in constant conflict, while others effectively lead organizations of 200+ because expectations are crystal clear. The difference isn't headcount—it's direction.
Don't get me wrong—coordination costs are real. There's a reason Belichick structured his organization with coordinators who managed position coaches. But that structure was in service of clarity, not arbitrary headcount targets.
The Bottom Line
The next time someone tells you your team is too big or too small, remember this: size matters far less than clarity. Whether you're leading 5 people or 50, ask yourself if everyone knows exactly what's expected of them and how success is measured.
That's the real lesson from Belichick's Patriots dynasty. It wasn't about having the perfect number of coaches—it was about making sure every single person understood their job and executed it with discipline.
In football and in business, that's how championships are won.
.webp?table=block&id=1f1cdb2c-dd0d-8014-a065-db717a5ba7b3&cache=v2)
